"More markets and
more marketing muscle will mean an increase in cord cutting across the
U.S.," Greenfield wrote in a report this week. If that happens, he added,
it could force cable and satellite providers to offer more low-cost video
packages to retain subscribers.
Broadcasters fear that
if people drop their pay service in favor of Aereo, it would cost the networks
money. Pay-TV distributors pay broadcasters retransmission consent fees to
carry their signals. According to industry consulting firm SNL Kagan, those
fees will reach $4 billion this year and close to $8 billion in 2019.
If the high court
sides with Aereo, Greenfield said, "the only true winner will be the
consumer."
Not REALLY the type of argument you want to present to the
public.
“Oh yeah if Aereo wins SO DO YOU, but that’s BAAAAAAAAAAAD.
For, you know…… reasons?”
I Hope aereo wins this because it would FORCE the
broadcasters and cable companies to hopefully rebuild their structure and give more financially conscious consumers other options, WHICH WE NEED!
“Another route for
broadcasters would be to convince the FCC that Aereo needs to be classified as
a multichannel video programming distributor.”
Well the only fair option if Aereo gets reclassified would
be reclassifying Broadband companies to a telecommunications service. This
would eliminate their hold against net neutrality though so again we don’t want
THE CONSUMER to win. We are companies and we love our consumers…….. MONEY!
Please don’t take that away.
Seriously pre online music purchasing “I-tunes” the record
companies were terrified they were going to lose profits. They had to re org
and re build. They now make more profits than ever. What are the broadcasters
REALLY afraid of?
No comments:
Post a Comment
What are your thoughts? Hello, Anyone..... Hello